JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 10, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Armando Arciniegas Niño

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Contra El Auto De Julio 15 De 2008 Emitido Por El Magistrado Sustanciador Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra Dentro Del Proceso De La Referencia. Se Resolvió Confirmar El Auto Citado A Través Del Cual Se Decidió Rechazar La Demanda Presentada Por El Ciudadano Armando Arciniegas Niño
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar el auto de julio 15 de 2008, mediante el cual el respectivo Magistrado sustanciador resolvio rechazar la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Armando Arciniegas Nino contra el paragrafo transitorio del articulo 2deg del Acto Legislativo 02 de 2004.
  2. Segundo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.